• Investing
  • Stock
Round Table Thoughts
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Home Economy Protectionism in Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act Harms Consumers and Domestic Industries
Economy

Protectionism in Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act Harms Consumers and Domestic Industries

by December 11, 2022
by December 11, 2022 0 comment
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

In The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith wrote, “It is the maxim of every prudent master of a family, never to attempt to make at home what it will cost more to make than to buy.” 

Smith then projects his observation of a household to that of a nation: “What is prudence in the conduct of every private family, can scarce be folly in that of a great kingdom.” 

A provision in the misnamed “Inflation Reduction Act” ignores Smith’s wisdom, and it will help to worsen, not reduce, inflation.

To qualify for the act’s tax credit of up to $7,500 on the purchase of an electric vehicle (EV), the vehicle’s battery must be made of minerals and components mostly extracted and produced in America, or otherwise in a country with which the US has an explicit free trade agreement. This provision excludes the output of many countries, including those in Europe, which can mine and produce the needed minerals and components at lower costs than American companies can.

Naturally, the provision has angered many member nations of the European Union, with some warning of “tit for tat” retaliatory restrictions or subsidies to punish American industries. A joint task force comprising US and EU representatives met Dec. 5 to attempt to address this issue.

But potential trade wars are not the only downside to such domestic favoritism. 

As Smith cautioned, insisting on building at home that which could be acquired at lower cost elsewhere wastes resources. Consumers are hit hardest, as they are deprived of cheaper alternatives. But that’s not the end of the harm.

In this case, if consumers are forced to pay more for EVs, they have less money left to spend on other items, such as clothing, restaurant dining, entertainment, and a host of other things. As a result, businesses in those industries (many of which are domestic businesses) are deprived of revenue. Their profit margins are squeezed, and they are forced to cut back on workers and production. 

Inefficient companies are protected from competition by political favoritism, at the expense of consumers and other domestic companies handicapped by government interference. An economy hampered by protectionism is less efficient, and the increased scarcity due to diminished output causes prices to be higher than they otherwise would be.  

In this specific case of targeted tax credits for EVs with certain batteries, you might argue that the consumer would not be harmed, because the tax credit would offset any higher price they would pay for the vehicles. 

But who is paying for the tax credit?

According to the Congressional Budget Office’s score of the bill, the “clean vehicle credit” will total more than $7.5 billion over ten years. The bill supposedly helps pay for credits such as this one largely through increased taxes elsewhere, along with increased IRS “tax enforcement activities” extracting still more tax dollars. The harms from these increased taxes will fall heaviest on the poor, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation. 

In short, tax credits for higher-income people buying expensive electric vehicles will be borne on the backs of the poor. 

Moreover, the most likely response from EV sellers will be to raise their prices in response to the tax credit offered to their customers. Say a dealer discovers that a customer is willing to pay $50,000 for an EV. Knowing the customer is eligible for a credit of $7,500, the dealer will raise the price to $57,500. 

The EV dealers and manufacturers will get to pocket the extra $7,500, in a classic example of political power-dynamics in which the party in charge rewards their donor class through payouts at the public’s expense.

Protectionist measures such as the one included in the Inflation Reduction Act give the appearance of “protecting American jobs.” In reality, however, the only jobs protected are those in the politically favored companies whose inefficiencies are protected from competition at the expense of other domestic jobs lost and higher prices on consumers.

You Might Also Like
  • Parkland dad slams Biden: ‘Don’t use my daughter’s death to advance your political agenda’
  • Families of Israeli hostages taken by Hamas meeting with Netanyahu
  • ‘Zuck Bucks 2.0’: Zuckerberg-funded group pushing millions to influence local election offices, report says
  • Missouri Republican lawmaker clarifies comments about 12-year-olds getting married
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

previous post
A Swiss Oasis of Liberal Sanity in a Totalitarian Europe
next post
4 central bank decisions to consider this week

You may also like

‘Nothing would remain’: Iran’s president vows to completely destroy Israel...

April 17, 2024

McCarthy floats meeting with Biden on government shutdown, border

September 27, 2023

Using the Grinch in photos to make money could empty...

December 17, 2023

House Republicans negotiate with president’s brother on deposition terms

January 23, 2024

Congress faces steep climb to avoid government shutdown less than...

November 4, 2023

US troops could pay price if NATO allies don’t make...

May 1, 2024

Biden’s Iran envoy kept classified material on personal email, cellphone...

May 9, 2024

Vance’s office doubles down ‘impeachment time bomb’ warning in foreign...

February 16, 2024

Conservative groups are pushing Speaker Johnson to reform controversial spy...

March 1, 2024

Trump’s second term foreign policy likely to focus on ‘strength’...

July 21, 2024

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Week Ahead: NIFTY Set To Stay In A Defined Range Unless These Levels Are Taken Out; Drags Support Higher

      July 5, 2025
    • Essence Fest leads a summer of events for Black entrepreneurs galvanized by economic uncertainty

      July 4, 2025
    • From Oversold to Opportunity: Small Caps on the Move

      July 3, 2025
    • Money’s Not Leaving the Market — It’s Rotating!

      July 3, 2025
    • Tariffs and weaker beer demand are weighing on Modelo owner Constellation Brands

      July 3, 2025

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese...

      June 25, 2024 3,629 views
    • 2

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be...

      June 27, 2024 2,914 views
    • 3

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as...

      August 9, 2024 2,603 views
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful...

      July 10, 2024 2,569 views
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility...

      August 29, 2024 2,445 views

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,163)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,653)

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese businesses to Delaware: ‘Longtime friends’

      June 25, 2024
    • 2

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be revived under new House GOP bill

      June 27, 2024
    • 3

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as Harris camp blasts ‘lying’ critics

      August 9, 2024
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful of Chinese spy threats

      July 10, 2024
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility that collaborated with ‘Chinese military company’

      August 29, 2024

    Latest News

    • Week Ahead: NIFTY Set To Stay In A Defined Range...

      July 5, 2025
    • Essence Fest leads a summer of events for Black entrepreneurs...

      July 4, 2025
    • From Oversold to Opportunity: Small Caps on the Move

      July 3, 2025

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,163)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,653)

    Disclaimer: RoundTableThoughts.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 RoundTableThoughts.com. All Rights Reserved.

    Round Table Thoughts
    • Investing
    • Stock
    Round Table Thoughts
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick

    Read alsox

    GOP senator challenges union boss to...

    June 27, 2023

    DeSantis mingles with congressional Republicans as...

    April 19, 2023

    Sen Graham touts Trump plan for...

    March 20, 2024
    Sign In

    Keep me signed in until I sign out

    Forgot your password?

    Password Recovery

    A new password will be emailed to you.

    Have received a new password? Login here