• Investing
  • Stock
Round Table Thoughts
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Home Economy Does the Fed Control Interest Rates?
Economy

Does the Fed Control Interest Rates?

by December 26, 2022
by December 26, 2022 0 comment
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

An interest rate is a price: the price of rented capital. Alternatively, interest is the price of time. It’s the cost borrowers pay to transfer purchasing power from their future selves to their current selves. Intertemporal markets are a crucial component of advanced market economies. For any society that expects living standards to rise over time, allocating capital to those who can put it to work is essential.

It’s common to say the Federal Reserve “sets” interest rates. Even if we restrict our analysis to the federal funds rate, which is the Fed’s preferred intermediate policy target, this is wrong. Like all prices, interest is determined by supply and demand in capital markets. The fed funds rate in particular is determined in the market for overnight bank reserves.

Central banks can influence interest rates, of course. But there’s a world of difference between influence and control. At best, when the Fed affects the federal funds rate, it helps markets transition to a new supply-and-demand equilibrium impelled by changes in economic fundamentals. At worst, Fed tinkering with the federal funds rate can temporarily misprice capital and, as with other misguided policies, harm the economy.

Below is a graph of the actual (market) federal funds rate and what the rate “should” be, based on an interest rate rule called the Taylor rule. The Taylor rule says the federal funds rate should rise when economic growth exceeds the economy’s long run-potential or when inflation is above policymakers’ target. It also says the federal funds rate should fall when economic growth is below the economy’s long-run potential or when inflation is below policymakers’ target. We can’t observe a perfectly “neutral” interest rate, meaning one that balances supply and demand in capital markets. But the Taylor rule is a useful approximation.

Often, the prescribed Taylor rule rate (blue) tracks the actual federal funds rate (red) pretty well. There are three notable exceptions. The first is 2002-2006. The second is 2010-2020. The third is 2021 onward. Let’s think about those.

During the earlier period, it looks like the Fed kept rates “too low for too long.” Does this contradict what we said earlier about the Fed not being able to control rates? Actually, it reinforces it. This was the Fed’s first major deviation from rule-like behavior since the Great Moderation. During the era of the “Greenspan put,” the “maestro” was happy to give turbulent securities markets a soft landing, so the Fed was looser than markets were expecting. The Fed only got away with keeping rates “too low for too long” by fooling markets. We know the result of this failed experiment: in conjunction with federal policies steering too much credit to housing, and decades of Fed-created moral hazard (“too big to fail”) in the financial system, the Fed’s inadvertent mispricing of capital set the stage for the 2008 financial crisis. Disaster occurred because the Fed’s actions were fundamentally unsustainable. Reality asserts itself in the end. So much for Fed “control!”

The second period is different. There was a major institutional change in monetary policy: The Fed gained the ability to pay interest on reserves. It could now incentivize member-banks of the Federal Reserve System not to loan out the new liquidity the Fed created to dampen the effects of the subprime mortgage meltdown. This severed the traditional link between the size of the Fed’s balance sheet and inflation. Now the Fed could “neutralize” its own monetary-base injections, targeting bank balance sheets without affecting broader economic aggregates. Note that interest on reserves is an administered rate, not a market rate. What we have here is a significant non-market (policy) change that allows the Fed to insulate itself against market forces temporarily. The Fed isn’t in the driver’s seat so much as riding shotgun in an out-of-control car.

The very last part, from 2021 onward, is almost self-explanatory. The Fed thought inflation was “transitory.” It wasn’t. The Fed should’ve tightened. It didn’t. Enough said.

The Fed is a failed institution in need of major reforms. But we won’t make the right changes if we don’t understand the basic relationship between central banks and capital markets.

You Might Also Like
  • Tensions reach boiling point in House GOP meeting hours before expected government shutdown
  • Trump super PAC touts massive May fundraising, plans major ad blitz in battlegrounds
  • Top White House aide urges staff to tune out ‘noise’ and focus on governing during debate fallout
  • Bernie Sanders leads lawmakers demanding DOJ prosecute fossil fuel companies for climate change
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

previous post
3 reasons to buy Visa and Mastercard stocks in 2023
next post
Stanford Fails to Master Clear Thinking

You may also like

White House unveils new AI regulations for federal agencies

March 28, 2024

Black Republican calls out Biden’s ‘real record on race’ in...

June 27, 2024

In Israel visit, Stefanik to tout Trump’s record on Jewish...

May 19, 2024

Labor Market Shows Early Signs of Loosening

January 6, 2023

China, Russia suffer setback to global ambitions with major player...

December 31, 2023

Trump federal election interference case sent back to trial court...

August 2, 2024

Hunter Biden spotted leaving eatery just before Rosie O’Donnell, who...

July 12, 2024

McCarthy GOP primary challenger praises eight Republicans who ousted him...

October 31, 2023

Israel hits Iran with ‘limited’ strikes despite White House’s reported...

April 19, 2024

Fauci and wife’s net worth exceeded $11M when he departed...

September 19, 2023

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Oil prices rise more than 1% as Israel vows to intensify attacks on Iran

      June 20, 2025
    • RRG Alert Tech Vaults to ‘Leading’—Is XLK Signaling a New Rally?

      June 20, 2025
    • Apple looking to make ‘premium’-priced folding iPhones starting next year, analyst says

      June 20, 2025
    • Nike pushes back Skims launch with Kim Kardashian due to production delays

      June 19, 2025
    • The Fed Is Getting It Wrong AGAIN As They Hold Rates Steady

      June 19, 2025

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese...

      June 25, 2024 3,599 views
    • 2

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be...

      June 27, 2024 2,875 views
    • 3

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as...

      August 9, 2024 2,578 views
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful...

      July 10, 2024 2,541 views
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility...

      August 29, 2024 2,417 views

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,142)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,621)

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese businesses to Delaware: ‘Longtime friends’

      June 25, 2024
    • 2

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be revived under new House GOP bill

      June 27, 2024
    • 3

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as Harris camp blasts ‘lying’ critics

      August 9, 2024
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful of Chinese spy threats

      July 10, 2024
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility that collaborated with ‘Chinese military company’

      August 29, 2024

    Latest News

    • Oil prices rise more than 1% as Israel vows to...

      June 20, 2025
    • RRG Alert Tech Vaults to ‘Leading’—Is XLK Signaling a New...

      June 20, 2025
    • Apple looking to make ‘premium’-priced folding iPhones starting next year,...

      June 20, 2025

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,142)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,621)

    Disclaimer: RoundTableThoughts.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 RoundTableThoughts.com. All Rights Reserved.

    Round Table Thoughts
    • Investing
    • Stock
    Round Table Thoughts
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick

    Read alsox

    Insiders reveal how Biden, Trump are...

    June 20, 2024

    Welcome the Disinflation, Beware the Narrative

    January 13, 2023

    Secret Service Director Cheatle resigns after...

    July 23, 2024
    Sign In

    Keep me signed in until I sign out

    Forgot your password?

    Password Recovery

    A new password will be emailed to you.

    Have received a new password? Login here