• Investing
  • Stock
Round Table Thoughts
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Home Economy Trump-Stormy Daniels settlement at heart of potential NY DA indictment didn’t violate campaign law: FEC expert
Economy

Trump-Stormy Daniels settlement at heart of potential NY DA indictment didn’t violate campaign law: FEC expert

by March 19, 2023
by March 19, 2023 0 comment
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

Prosecutors in the Manhattan district attorney’s office won’t have much of a legal leg to stand on if they indict former President Donald Trump on violating campaign finance law, according to a legal expert and former member of the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

‘If the state charges are based on a supposed violation of federal campaign finance law, then the Manhattan DA is way off base,’ Hans von Spakovsky told Fox News Digital.

Von Spakovsky’s comments came shortly after Trump said Saturday that he expects to be arrested Tuesday amid reports saying the Manhattan district attorney’s office is preparing to issue an indictment for alleged hush money payments that Trump made as a presidential candidate in 2016.

‘NOW ILLEGAL LEAKS FROM A CORRUPT & HIGHLY POLITICAL MANHATTAN DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, WHICH HAS ALLOWED NEW RECORDS TO BE SET IN VIOLENT CRIME & WHOSE LEADER IS FUNDED BY GEORGE SOROS, INDICATE THAT, WITH NO CRIME BEING ABLE TO BE PROVEN, & BASED ON AN OLD & FULLY DEBUNKED (BY NUMEROUS OTHER PROSECUTORS!) FAIRYTALE, THE FAR & AWAY LEADING REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE & FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILL BE ARRESTED ON TUESDAY OF NEXT WEEK. PROTEST, TAKE OUR NATION BACK!, [sic]’ Trump posed to his Truth Social account.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office will reportedly meet with law enforcement officials to discuss logistics for some time next week regarding a potential indictment, which stems from a years-long investigation into Trump’s alleged hush money scandal involving porn star Stormy Daniels.

In the final weeks of the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump’s then-lawyer Michael Cohen sent $130,000 to Daniels to prevent her from disclosing her alleged 2006 affair with Trump, who has denied the affair. Trump subsequently reimbursed Cohen.

It’s been widely speculated that Trump could be charged with overseeing the false recording of the reimbursements in his company’s internal records as ‘legal expenses.’

Prosecutors are also expected to charge Trump with violating campaign finance laws by arranging the payments to buy Daniels’ silence weeks before the 2016 election. However, experts have questioned the legal reasoning behind such a charge.

‘A settlement payment of a nuisance claim is not a federal campaign expense,’ said von Spakovsky, a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation. ‘The state DA has no authority to prosecute a federal campaign finance violation in any event.’

Such cases, he argues, are within the province of the FEC, where he served as a commissioner, or the U.S. Justice Department, explaining that both agencies have known about the facts for years but have chosen not to prosecute Trump.

‘So, the federal agencies with jurisdiction did not consider it a violation,’ said von Spakovsky, who’s been following this case for years.

In 2018, von Spakovsky wrote that the payment to Daniels seemed to be a ‘nuisance settlement,’ which celebrities often make, especially when faced with the threat of a false or salacious claim.

‘Critics of the president claim this not only was a campaign expense that should have been reported but a potentially illegal loan by Cohen. But the settlement was ultimately paid out of Trump’s personal funds and had nothing to do with the campaign since their alleged one-night stand occurred 10 years before the campaign,’ wrote von Spakovsky. ‘No reasonable member of a jury would consider this to be a campaign-related expense that needed to be reported, or to which any other campaign finance rules in the Federal Election Campaign Act apply.’

Von Spakovsky noted in his 2018 analysis that the Department of Justice already tried out this theory with former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, whose campaign donors paid up to $1 million to Edwards’ mistress, Rielle Hunter, while she was working as a videographer for Edwards and his presidential campaign.

The Department Justice tried to argue these were campaign-related payments, even though they didn’t go through the Edwards campaign’s accounts, because they were intended to protect Edwards’ reputation during his presidential bid. A jury acquitted Edwards on one charge of accepting an illegal campaign donation and failed to reach a verdict on the other charges, resulting in a mistrial.

The Department of Justice dropped its prosecution and never retried Edwards.

‘The alleged one-night stand between Daniels and Trump is far more of a stretch,’ wrote von Spakovsky. ‘Daniels had no connection to the presidential campaign of any kind and the encounter — if it occurred — didn’t happen during the campaign itself. In any event, even if the Daniels payment were to be considered a campaign-related expense, unlike Edwards, the nominal $130,000 payment wasn’t made by Trump campaign donors but by Trump’s personal attorney (not the campaign’s attorney) with whom he has a long-standing business relationship. . . . Even if one might be able to reasonably construe the payment to Daniels as somehow related to the presidential campaign, there still would be no violation since candidates are allowed to spend as much of their own money as they want on their own campaigns.’

Von Spakovsky told Fox News Digital that his ‘opinion hasn’t changed’ since writing that article.

Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung described the ongoing probe as a ‘witch hunt,’ calling the former president ‘completely innocent’ and accusing Bragg of being in the pocket of President Biden and ‘radical Democrats.’ 

The Manhattan district attorney’s office didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment for this story.

Aaron Kliegman is a politics reporter for Fox News Digital. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
You Might Also Like
  • Senate unanimously passes resolution to reinstate formal dress code after Sen. John Fetterman controversy
  • Services-Sector Sees a Plunge in New Orders in December
  • Congress pushes aggressive use of AI in the federal government, says AI ‘under-utilized’ in agencies
  • Biden touts pro-Native American efforts despite axing oil drilling that sustains tribes
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

previous post
Here’s What the Markets are Telling Us – And It’s Not All Bad
next post
Trump gears up for 2024 rally in Waco, Texas amid ongoing federal investigation, possible NY indictment

You may also like

House Judiciary investigating whether Fulton County DA Fani Willis ‘coordinated’...

December 7, 2023

Pence and Trump: From running mates to rivals for the...

June 5, 2023

China’s threats, ‘naked aggression’ loom large as House lawmakers meet...

May 27, 2024

Hamas claims it will ‘protect’ hostages, release them ‘when circumstances...

October 17, 2023

UK Prime Minister puts US officials on blast regarding Hamas:...

October 19, 2023

Female fashion designer alleges Sam Brinton wore her clothing that...

February 23, 2023

Hunter Biden pleads not guilty to tax charges brought by...

January 12, 2024

Biden admin takes aim at hunters in latest regulation: ‘Preventing...

June 23, 2023

Amazon tech guru: Eating less beef, more fish good for...

July 8, 2023

Barr slams Trump as weak candidate, makes bold prediction for...

April 10, 2023

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • S&P 500 Bullish Patterns: Are Higher Highs Ahead?

      June 3, 2025
    • McDonald’s Snack Wrap is officially returning. Here’s when.

      June 3, 2025
    • Tesla’s robotaxi launch in tech-friendly Austin has Musk playing catch-up in his hometown

      June 3, 2025
    • Uber delivery chief Gore-Coty is leaving after almost 13 years at ride-hailing company

      June 3, 2025
    • Elon Musk’s Neuralink raises $650 million in fresh capital

      June 3, 2025

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be...

      June 27, 2024 2,773 views
    • 2

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as...

      August 9, 2024 2,478 views
    • 3

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese...

      June 25, 2024 2,458 views
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful...

      July 10, 2024 2,440 views
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility...

      August 29, 2024 2,317 views

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,111)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,587)

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be revived under new House GOP bill

      June 27, 2024
    • 2

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as Harris camp blasts ‘lying’ critics

      August 9, 2024
    • 3

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese businesses to Delaware: ‘Longtime friends’

      June 25, 2024
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful of Chinese spy threats

      July 10, 2024
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility that collaborated with ‘Chinese military company’

      August 29, 2024

    Latest News

    • S&P 500 Bullish Patterns: Are Higher Highs Ahead?

      June 3, 2025
    • McDonald’s Snack Wrap is officially returning. Here’s when.

      June 3, 2025
    • Tesla’s robotaxi launch in tech-friendly Austin has Musk playing catch-up...

      June 3, 2025

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,111)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,587)

    Disclaimer: RoundTableThoughts.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 RoundTableThoughts.com. All Rights Reserved.

    Round Table Thoughts
    • Investing
    • Stock
    Round Table Thoughts
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick

    Read alsox

    Lawmakers rattled by AI-launched nukes, demand...

    July 6, 2023

    Grassley, Graham demand FBI turn over...

    June 22, 2023

    Texas judge rules state’s abortion law...

    August 5, 2023
    Sign In

    Keep me signed in until I sign out

    Forgot your password?

    Password Recovery

    A new password will be emailed to you.

    Have received a new password? Login here