• Investing
  • Stock
Round Table Thoughts
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Home Economy John Edwards’ hush-money case could be good news for Trump, bad news for Manhattan DA Bragg, experts say
Economy

John Edwards’ hush-money case could be good news for Trump, bad news for Manhattan DA Bragg, experts say

by April 4, 2023
by April 4, 2023 0 comment
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

Former President Donald Trump’s indictment has drawn comparisons in recent days to the failed hush-money case against former Democratic senator and presidential candidate John Edwards.

In 2011, Edwards faced six felony charges relating to campaign finance law violations for accepting $1 million from donors to obscure his affair during his 2008 presidential campaign. In 2012, a jury acquitted Edwards on one count of receiving illegal campaign contributions and deadlocked on the others, which the Justice Department declined to pursue again.

A Manhattan grand jury indicted Trump last Thursday as part of the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office’s years-long investigation into his alleged hush-money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal.

While Edwards faced federal charges and Trump now faces state charges, experts see similarities in both cases, which they say could benefit Trump.

Fox News Digital spoke with several experts – including a law professor, former Federal Election Commission members and a former federal prosecutor – who spelled out why Edwards’ case could be bad news for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

Here’s what they had to say.

Bradley Smith – Josiah H. Blackmore II/Shirley M. Nault designated professor at Capital University School of Law and former Federal Election Commission member

‘The Edwards scenario is relevant for two reasons. First, as much as I criticize the theory of District Attorney Bragg, it’s worth noting that the federal district court judge in the Edwards case let the case go to trial on basically what was that theory – that friends of the candidate were paying a woman off to be quiet that counted as a campaign expenditure,’ Smith told Fox News Digital in a phone interview.

‘The other point about it is the jury found in favor of Edwards. They hung on some charges, and on others, they acquitted,’ he continued. ‘I think that illustrates the tremendous difficulty of winning this kind of case both on the law and the facts.’

‘In the Edwards case, they were actually trying a federal case. Here, they’re not actually trying a federal case,’ Smith said. ‘If they go ahead to go to trial and find Trump guilty, he’s not going to be found guilty of federal campaign finance violations; he’s going to be found guilty of violating the New York state law on altering business records in order to cover up other crimes, which are allegedly these campaign finance crimes.’

‘So, the prosecutor has sort of a case within a case,’ Smith added. ‘He’s got to prove Trump committed this New York crime, but to prove Trump committed this New York crime, he’s going to have to prove that had he been the U.S. attorney, he would have brought this federal crime and won on that.’

‘That’s a very tough thing for a prosecutor to do, but on the other hand, it could be a helpful thing,’ Smith said. ‘If you get [to] the jury, you don’t have to show the federal crime beyond a reasonable doubt; you just have to [get the] jury thinking, ‘Trump’s probably a bad guy and probably did it,’ then maybe that’s enough, and they convict on the state crime.’

Hans von Spakovsky – Senior legal fellow at Heritage Foundation and former Federal Election Commission member

‘I think that what it foreshadows is that Alvin Bragg is trying to make out that there was a violation of federal of campaign finance law, but when the Justice Department moved against John Edwards – and remember the claim was that big political donors of Edwards didn’t give money to the campaign but gave money directly to his mistress that was somehow a violation of campaign finance law – and they failed,’ Spakovsky told Fox News Digital. ‘The jury didn’t buy that.’

‘I think that shows that the one time the Justice Department tried to pursue a case like this, it failed,’ he continued. ‘That was probably the biggest reason why the Justice Department and the FEC didn’t go after Trump because they didn’t believe that it was – based on prior experience – a violation of federal campaign finance law, and that’s the biggest flaw in this whole case.’

‘The FEC long ago established what they call the ‘irrespective test,’ which is the way the FEC determines whether something is a campaign-related expense and, therefore, is covered by all the laws and regulations – ‘would that expense exist irrespective if you’re running for office?”

‘That’s why you can’t use campaign money, for example, to pay the mortgage on your house, buy a car, because all those expenses would exist whether or not you were running for office or not,’ Spakovsky added.

‘I think here, a settlement of a personal injury claim – because that’s essentially what this was – that claim would exist irrespective of whether you’re running for office or not. It might be more important because you’re running for office, but when you apply the FEC’s test to it, it’s not a campaign-related expense and, therefore, none of the federal rules apply to it.’

Katie Cherkasky – Former federal prosecutor and criminal defense and civil rights attorney

‘The John Edwards case is the exact same type of charge, except the Edwards case was much stronger from a criminal prosecutorial perspective than this Trump case,’ Cherkasky told Fox News Digital.

‘Even in that case, they obviously were not able to get a conviction,’ Cherkasky said. ‘The reason for that is when you’re charging these campaign finance violations, it’s a specific intent crime. The prosecution has to prove the individual not only failed to properly account for campaign finance funds but that the reason that they did that was for purposes of campaign fraud, not for some other purpose.’

‘When you’re looking at the Edwards case, the reason they likely couldn’t get a conviction on that was because of the intent for the payment – remember, hush-money payments are lawful; it’s just a matter of how they’re reported if that’s what they’re for – the intent for those payments could have very well been for a personal purpose to avoid embarrassment to his wife, who was very ill at that time, and any other option besides the fact that it was solely for the purpose of impacting an election – that’s going to get you an acquittal,’ Cherkasky said.

‘The Edwards case was a prime example of this being tried by a prosecutor, and that case was much stronger because there was no dispute that the money had been paid and Edwards was personally involved with that. Trump is not even conceding that much,’ she added.

‘The prosecution in the Trump case has even more hurdles to get over. Even if they were able to get to the point where they could show Trump was directly involved with those payments, they still have those intent problems: ‘Why did he pay her off?”

‘If it was a nuisance payoff or anything other than an intent to interfere with the election, then they’re going to have a problem with their proof,’ Cherkasky said.

Fox News Digital’s Andrew Murray and Thomas Catenacci contributed to this report.

Joe Schoffstall is a politics producer/reporter for Fox News Digital. Story tips can be sent to Joe.Schoffstall@Fox.com and on Twitter: @joeschoffstall

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
You Might Also Like
  • Margin of error race between Harris-Trump in new poll conducted after Biden dropped
  • Chair Jordan demands answers from dozens of major companies tied to shadowy ‘collusive’ ad group
  • Israel hits Iran with ‘limited’ strikes despite White House’s reported opposition
  • NC Gov. Cooper urges against large paper mill’s closure
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

previous post
A-Rod spotted near Trump Tower as crowds await Trump’s arrival for Tuesday arraignment
next post
Taxpayers are getting about $360 less from their refunds this year as the inflation struggle persists

You may also like

DeSantis super PAC hammers Haley with Clinton comparison in million-dollar...

December 6, 2023

As Biden documents probe unfolds, Americans weigh in on how...

January 18, 2023

Defying Trump, House GOP plans to forge ahead with TikTok...

March 12, 2024

Kohl’s Shares Plunge 11%

November 26, 2024

Gavin Newsom’s wife’s films shown in schools contain explicit images,...

January 20, 2023

ApeCoin and Akita Inu: Targets and Price Overview 

October 8, 2024

Fiscal Crises in American Cities

November 27, 2022

WATCH: GOP voters rally around Trump following Jan. 6 charges

August 6, 2023

White House: Eli Lilly’s insulin price cap shows why GOP...

March 2, 2023

Israel says UN ‘deceiving’ world over aid delays to Gaza

March 28, 2024

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Essence Fest leads a summer of events for Black entrepreneurs galvanized by economic uncertainty

      July 4, 2025
    • From Oversold to Opportunity: Small Caps on the Move

      July 3, 2025
    • Money’s Not Leaving the Market — It’s Rotating!

      July 3, 2025
    • Tariffs and weaker beer demand are weighing on Modelo owner Constellation Brands

      July 3, 2025
    • Microsoft laying off about 9,000 employees in latest round of cuts

      July 3, 2025

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese...

      June 25, 2024 3,628 views
    • 2

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be...

      June 27, 2024 2,910 views
    • 3

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as...

      August 9, 2024 2,601 views
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful...

      July 10, 2024 2,566 views
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility...

      August 29, 2024 2,442 views

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,163)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,652)

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese businesses to Delaware: ‘Longtime friends’

      June 25, 2024
    • 2

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be revived under new House GOP bill

      June 27, 2024
    • 3

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as Harris camp blasts ‘lying’ critics

      August 9, 2024
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful of Chinese spy threats

      July 10, 2024
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility that collaborated with ‘Chinese military company’

      August 29, 2024

    Latest News

    • Essence Fest leads a summer of events for Black entrepreneurs...

      July 4, 2025
    • From Oversold to Opportunity: Small Caps on the Move

      July 3, 2025
    • Money’s Not Leaving the Market — It’s Rotating!

      July 3, 2025

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,163)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,652)

    Disclaimer: RoundTableThoughts.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 RoundTableThoughts.com. All Rights Reserved.

    Round Table Thoughts
    • Investing
    • Stock
    Round Table Thoughts
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick

    Read alsox

    White House ‘grateful’ to Mexico for...

    May 5, 2023

    Hunter Biden’s ‘sugar brother’ keeps the...

    May 29, 2023

    Biden cuts beach trip short amid...

    April 14, 2024
    Sign In

    Keep me signed in until I sign out

    Forgot your password?

    Password Recovery

    A new password will be emailed to you.

    Have received a new password? Login here