• Investing
  • Stock
Round Table Thoughts
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Home Economy Justice Ketanji Jackson’s faulty claim in affirmative action case takes another hit as lawyers ‘clarify’ brief
Economy

Justice Ketanji Jackson’s faulty claim in affirmative action case takes another hit as lawyers ‘clarify’ brief

by July 9, 2023
by July 9, 2023 0 comment
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has faced scrutiny for making a flawed claim about Black infant mortality under White doctors in her dissenting opinion to last week’s landmark affirmative action decision.

Jackson sought to show that race-based admissions are a matter of life and death for racial minorities, and her dissenting opinion in the Supreme Court’s ruling on Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard cited an example. The law firm apparently responsible for the misleading statement sought to ‘clarify’ the claim on Friday.

Seeking to show that considering race in admissions was fair and realizes equality, Jackson argued in her dissent that diversity ‘saves lives’ and is essential for ‘marginalized communities.’ She asserted that diversity is for the ‘betterment’ of students and society at large beyond college campuses.

‘For high-risk Black newborns, having a Black physician more than doubles the likelihood that the baby will live, and not die,’ Jackson wrote as one example.

That claim came from an amicus brief filed by lawyers representing an association of medical colleges. The brief stated that for ‘high-risk Black newborns, having a Black physician is tantamount to a miracle drug; it more than doubles the likelihood that the baby will live,’ citing as support a 2020 study that examined mortality rates in Florida newborns between 1992 and 2015. 

In a letter Friday filed to the Supreme Court docket, Norton Rose Fulbright wrote that the argument cited by Jackson in her opinion ‘warrants clarification’ and sought to clear up any ‘confusion.’

‘The principal cited finding of the [study] was that the mortality rate for Black newborns, as compared to White newborns, decreased by more than half when under the supervision of Black physician,’ the law firm’s letter said. ‘In absolute terms, this study found that patient-physician racial concordance led to a reduction in health inequity.’

However, the letter continued, while survival and mortality may be opposites and decreased mortality generally indicates increased survival, ‘statistically they are not interchangeable. Thus, the statement in the [amicus brief] warrants clarification.’

Still, the lawyer added that the study nonetheless supports Jackson’s argument in her dissent, expressing ‘regret’ for ‘any confusion’ that may have been caused by the statement in its brief.

The letter to the Supreme Court added that a ‘more precise’ summary of the 2020 study’s findings would have been to say that ‘having a Black physician reduces by more than half the likelihood of death for Black newborns as compared to White newborns.’

In other words, Jackson’s claim in her opinion that having a Black physician ‘more than doubles the likelihood that the baby will survive’ could be misleading, because the study on which that statement is based examined lower mortality rates, which is not the same thing statistically as survival.

Norton Rose Fulbright’s letter came after Jackson’s statement in her dissenting opinion caught the attention of several legal experts.

In a Wall Street Journal op-ed this week, Ted Frank, a senior attorney at Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, responded directly to Jackson’s claim, lambasting the justice for making a mathematical error.

‘A moment’s thought should be enough to realize that this claim is wildly implausible,’ wrote Frank, who filed an amicus brief in support of Students for Fair Admissions. ‘Imagine if 40% of black newborns died — thousands of dead infants every week. But even so, that’s a 60% survival rate, which is mathematically impossible to double. And the actual survival rate is over 99%. How could Justice Jackson make such an innumerate mistake?’

Frank went on to argue that the 2020 study was ‘flawed’ and didn’t match Jackson’s claim about Black newborns having a significantly higher chance of surviving with a Black physician.

‘The study makes no such claims. It examines mortality rates in Florida newborns between 1992 and 2015 and shows a 0.13% to 0.2% improvement in survival rates for Black newborns with Black pediatricians (though no statistically significant improvement for black obstetricians),’ Frank wrote. 

‘So, we have a Supreme Court justice parroting a mathematically absurd claim coming from an interested party’s mischaracterization of a flawed study. Her opinion then urges ‘all of us’ to ‘do what evidence and experts tell us is required to level the playing field and march forward together.’ Instead, we should watch where we’re going.’

Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University and Fox News contributor, used Frank’s op-ed and Jackson’s opinion to argue in a blog post Friday that it can be problematic when various advocacy groups file waves of amicus briefs in Supreme Court cases supporting one side or the other by pushing studies and other data that the justices use in their arguments.

‘My opposition to the brief is that the justices are in a poor position to judge the veracity or accuracy of such studies,’ Turley wrote. ‘They simply pick and choose between rivaling studies to claim a definitive factual foundation for an opinion.

‘When you are before the Supreme Court, everyone is free to just dump statistics and studies into the record, and the court regularly uses such material to determine the outcome. 

‘It produces more of a legislative environment for the court as different parties insert data to support their own view of what is a better policy or more serious social problem. There is only a limited ability of parties to challenge such data given limits on time and space in briefing. The result is that major decisions or dissents can be built on highly contested factual assertions. In this case, critics believe that the Jackson argument literally does not add up.’

The Supreme Court ended affirmative action in a landmark 6-3 decision June 29. The case combined lawsuits brought against Harvard University and the University of North Carolina by the student activist group Students for Fair Admissions, which argued that the schools’ admissions programs discriminated against Asian applicants in violation of, respectively, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.

‘A benefit to a student whose herit­age or culture motivated him or her to assume a leadership role or attain a particular goal must be tied to that student’s unique ability to contribute to the university,’ Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the court’s majority opinion.

Aaron Kliegman is a politics reporter for Fox News Digital. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
You Might Also Like
  • House Dems defend Jeffries as Left’s disarray over Biden grows
  • Trump, Haley battle for big donors while Biden campaign sits on massive cash reserve
  • Ex-Trump aide sued by Hunter Biden wants Biden-appointed judge off laptop case, fears ‘2020 all over again’
  • George Soros funneled tens of thousands to Stacey Abrams’ firm for consulting services, filings show
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

previous post
Abbott moves ahead with floating border barriers on Rio Grande despite liberal outrage
next post
Former mafia boss says he tried to do deals with former President Trump in the 1980’s

You may also like

Jewish seminary in Israel: Gaza border reopens following deadly Hamas...

December 29, 2023

‘Terrible message’: GOP lawmaker fumes after only 5 House Dems...

July 11, 2024

Minor, faceless federal officials would be stripped of their power...

January 17, 2023

DAVID MARCUS: Harris and Walz’s bizarre skit exposes double standard...

August 17, 2024

GOP senators demand answers on CIA whistleblower allegations of COVID-19...

September 15, 2023

Amid fentanyl crisis, Biden says Mexican president is asking US...

June 17, 2023

Nevada’s GOP governor signs law enhancing penalties for election worker...

June 1, 2023

White House accuses McCarthy of making ‘secret agreements’ to become...

January 17, 2023

House GOP majority to shrink again in time for potential...

January 4, 2024

WATCH: Biden ignores reporters when pressed on Hunter’s new indictment

December 9, 2023

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • How to Find Compelling Charts in Every Sector

      July 10, 2025
    • White House accuses Powell of mismanaging Federal Reserve, citing headquarters renovation

      July 10, 2025
    • Italian chocolate giant Ferrero to buy Kellogg’s Froot Loops maker

      July 10, 2025
    • OpenAI to release web browser in challenge to Google Chrome

      July 10, 2025
    • Sports executive charged with bid-rigging in Texas arena project

      July 10, 2025

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese...

      June 25, 2024 3,631 views
    • 2

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be...

      June 27, 2024 2,919 views
    • 3

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as...

      August 9, 2024 2,607 views
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful...

      July 10, 2024 2,577 views
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility...

      August 29, 2024 2,449 views

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,171)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,662)

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese businesses to Delaware: ‘Longtime friends’

      June 25, 2024
    • 2

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be revived under new House GOP bill

      June 27, 2024
    • 3

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as Harris camp blasts ‘lying’ critics

      August 9, 2024
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful of Chinese spy threats

      July 10, 2024
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility that collaborated with ‘Chinese military company’

      August 29, 2024

    Latest News

    • How to Find Compelling Charts in Every Sector

      July 10, 2025
    • White House accuses Powell of mismanaging Federal Reserve, citing headquarters...

      July 10, 2025
    • Italian chocolate giant Ferrero to buy Kellogg’s Froot Loops maker

      July 10, 2025

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,171)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,662)

    Disclaimer: RoundTableThoughts.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 RoundTableThoughts.com. All Rights Reserved.

    Round Table Thoughts
    • Investing
    • Stock
    Round Table Thoughts
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick

    Read alsox

    Several House Republicans urge lawmakers return...

    July 31, 2023

    Trump had one of his best...

    February 12, 2024

    US refugee orgs met with racism,...

    April 10, 2023
    Sign In

    Keep me signed in until I sign out

    Forgot your password?

    Password Recovery

    A new password will be emailed to you.

    Have received a new password? Login here