• Investing
  • Stock
Round Table Thoughts
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Home Editor's Pick Chase customers sue over fees for depositing checks that bounce
Editor's Pick

Chase customers sue over fees for depositing checks that bounce

by February 22, 2024
by February 22, 2024 0 comment
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

JPMorgan Chase was sued by customers who accused the largest U.S. bank of having unfairly charged fees when they deposited checks that, through no fault of their own, bounced.

In a proposed class action filed on Tuesday night, five customers said New York-based Chase docked $12 “deposited item returned fees” from their accounts when checks they tried to deposit were returned unpaid.

Checks can bounce for many reasons, including when writers do not have enough money in their accounts or issue stop payment orders, or when the checks contain errors.

The Chase customers called the bank’s “junk fees” for returned checks “unconscionable” and “predatory,” citing an October 2022 U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau bulletin that said indiscriminately charging such fees was likely illegal.

“By charging these deposited item return fees, Chase unfairly targeted its customers with financial penalties for faulty checks the customers had no hand in issuing,” the complaint said. “They did nothing wrong, yet were penalized.”

Chase declined to comment on the lawsuit, but said it stopped charging the fees in December 2022.

The five customers said they were charged between November 2021 and October 2022.

Their lawyer Lisa Considine called imposing the fees “a pervasive and unfair industry practice.”

The complaint seeks at least $5 million of damages for Chase customers nationwide, alleging violations of New York, California, Illinois and New Jersey consumer protection laws. It was filed in the White Plains, New York federal court.

In October, the Biden administration called for a crackdown on hidden and surprise fees in banking and other sectors including car rentals, hotels and concert tickets, saying the fees cost Americans tens of billions of dollars a year.

The case is Maslowski et al v JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 24-01277.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS
You Might Also Like
  • Major retailers are backtracking on self-checkout
  • As ‘Dry January’ becomes more popular, some express sticker shock at the price of mocktails
  • Mattel says Barbies and Hot Wheels could soon get more expensive under Trump’s tariffs
  • Data center boom in world’s largest market isn’t slowing down, Dominion Energy says
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

previous post
More than 15 million Toshiba laptop adapters recalled due to fire hazards
next post
James Biden ‘contradicted’ himself during testimony on brother’s involvement in family business: GOP lawmakers

You may also like

Last-minute summer travelers are finding the best deals in years

August 12, 2024

IoT Analytics: The IoT year 2022 in review

January 11, 2023

Why regulators seized Signature Bank in the third-biggest bank failure...

March 16, 2023

Silver lining for consumers: Food price growth has gone flat...

May 15, 2024

Online retailer Zulily is shutting down

December 29, 2023

In-N-Out Burger bars employees in 5 states from wearing masks

July 20, 2023

Bronfman’s Paramount bid could keep Shari Redstone involved at the...

August 26, 2024

ONE announces project with Sony Network Communications Europe to create...

February 20, 2023

A man once sued by the SEC wins Trump crypto...

May 21, 2025

Amazon set to pass Walmart in revenue for first time

February 6, 2025

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Nike pushes back Skims launch with Kim Kardashian due to production delays

      June 19, 2025
    • The Fed Is Getting It Wrong AGAIN As They Hold Rates Steady

      June 19, 2025
    • DOJ seizes record $225 million in crypto tied to global ‘pig butchering’ scams

      June 19, 2025
    • Feeling Unsure About the Stock Market’s Next Move? These Charts Can Help

      June 18, 2025
    • Amazon expects to cut corporate jobs as it relies more on AI

      June 18, 2025

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese...

      June 25, 2024 3,598 views
    • 2

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be...

      June 27, 2024 2,871 views
    • 3

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as...

      August 9, 2024 2,574 views
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful...

      July 10, 2024 2,537 views
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility...

      August 29, 2024 2,412 views

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,140)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,620)

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese businesses to Delaware: ‘Longtime friends’

      June 25, 2024
    • 2

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be revived under new House GOP bill

      June 27, 2024
    • 3

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as Harris camp blasts ‘lying’ critics

      August 9, 2024
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful of Chinese spy threats

      July 10, 2024
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility that collaborated with ‘Chinese military company’

      August 29, 2024

    Latest News

    • Nike pushes back Skims launch with Kim Kardashian due to...

      June 19, 2025
    • The Fed Is Getting It Wrong AGAIN As They Hold...

      June 19, 2025
    • DOJ seizes record $225 million in crypto tied to global...

      June 19, 2025

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,140)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,620)

    Disclaimer: RoundTableThoughts.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 RoundTableThoughts.com. All Rights Reserved.

    Round Table Thoughts
    • Investing
    • Stock
    Round Table Thoughts
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick

    Read alsox

    Netflix announces ‘broad rollout’ of password-sharing...

    April 19, 2023

    MSNBC President Rashida Jones steps down...

    January 14, 2025

    American Express to pay $230 million...

    January 17, 2025
    Sign In

    Keep me signed in until I sign out

    Forgot your password?

    Password Recovery

    A new password will be emailed to you.

    Have received a new password? Login here