• Investing
  • Stock
Round Table Thoughts
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Home Economy Trump trial: Jury selection to resume after possible jurors excused for saying they could not be impartial
Economy

Trump trial: Jury selection to resume after possible jurors excused for saying they could not be impartial

by April 16, 2024
by April 16, 2024 0 comment
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

The second day of jury selection in former President Trump’s Manhattan criminal trial is expected to begin Tuesday after half of prospective jurors were excused Monday for saying they could not be impartial toward the presumptive Republican nominee.

Court is expected to begin again for the second day of Trump’s trial at 9:30 a.m. and will resume with jury selection.

The trial comes after Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg charged the former president with 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree related to alleged hush money payments made before the 2016 presidential election.

Trump pleaded not guilty to all counts last year.

‘It’s a scam. It’s a political witch hunt,’ Trump said after court adjourned Monday.

Prospective jurors were asked to answer 42 questions from a questionnaire that reviews the individual’s work history, political affiliation and what media they chose to watch and listen to.

But more than 50 of the original 96 prospective jurors were excused almost immediately for admitting they could not serve as impartial jurors. Several were excused due to other issues.

New York Judge Juan Merchan is presiding over the trial, despite Trump’s request to have him recuse himself due to his alleged hostility toward the former president and due to his daughter’s work with Democrat politicians.

Merchan, from the bench on Monday, said there was ‘no basis’ for him to recuse himself.

The judge later addressed the former president directly, telling him that he has a right to be present at the trial each day to assist in his defense.

Merchan warned the former president that if he disrupts proceedings in any way, he would be held in contempt and could be removed from the court. Merchan also said that if Trump is required to appear and fails to do so, a warrant would be issued for his arrest. 

Trump did not verbally respond but nodded in agreement with the judge.

The trial is expected to last for approximately six weeks. The court will not meet on Wednesdays and will not meet on Monday, April 29.

After jurors were excused for the day, Merchan rejected a defense request that Trump be excused from the trial next Thursday to attend arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court.

The high court is hearing arguments on April 25 on the issue of presidential immunity and on whether Trump is immune from prosecution in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s election interference case.

‘Arguing before the Supreme Court is a big deal, and I can certainly appreciate why your client would want to be there, but a trial in New York Supreme Court … is also a big deal,’ Merchan said, rebuffing Trump lawyer Todd Blanche’s request.

Merchan added, ‘I will see him here next week.’

Trump also requested to attend the high school graduation ceremony for his son, Barron Trump, on May 17. Merchan has not yet decided on whether the former president can be present to celebrate his son.

‘It looks like the judge will not let me go to the graduation of my son who’s worked very, very hard,’ Trump said after court adjourned Monday. ‘He’s a great student, and he’s very proud of the fact that he did so well and was looking forward for years to have graduation with his mother and father there. And it looks like the judge isn’t going to allow me to escape this scam; it’s a scam trial.’

Meanwhile, Merchan had imposed a gag order on Trump last month due to his ‘prior extrajudicial statements.’ Merchan said they established ‘a sufficient risk to the administration of justice.’

Merchan ordered that Trump cannot make or direct others to make public statements about witnesses concerning their potential participation or about counsel in the case — other than Bragg — or about court staff, DA staff or family members of staff.

Merchan also ordered that Trump cannot make or direct others to make public statements about any prospective juror or chosen juror.

In court Monday, prosecutors from Bragg’s office argued that Trump had violated his gag order on three separate occasions on social media. Prosecutors said Trump should be fined $3,000 for the three alleged violations of the gag order – $1,000 for each violation. 

‘The defendant is aware of the April 1 order. We know that from various posts he had made,’ said prosecutor Christopher Conroy. 

‘We think it is important for the court to remind Mr. Trump is a criminal defendant,’ Conroy added, flagging that Trump might have again violated the gag order Monday morning while attending court.

Blanche argued that the three posts highlighted by prosecutors did not violate the gag order.  

‘He is responding to salacious, repeated, vehement attacks by these witnesses,’ Blanche said. 

Merchan said he will hear arguments on whether Trump violated the gag order on April 23 at 9:30 a.m.

Bragg, last April, charged Trump with 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. The charges are related to alleged hush money payments made during the 2016 presidential campaign.

The DA alleged that Trump ‘repeatedly and fraudulently falsified New York business records to conceal criminal conduct that hid damaging information from the voting public during the 2016 presidential election.’

According to New York state law, a charge of falsifying business records in the first degree alleges that the defendant committed a crime of falsifying business records with the intent to defraud. The intent to defraud would be an intent to commit another crime.

In 2019, federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York investigated the matter and opted not to charge Trump related to the alleged payments made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal.

The Federal Election Commission also tossed its investigation into the matter in 2021.

Fox News’ Grace Taggart contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
You Might Also Like
  • Israel ambassador slams UN council’s statement criticizing Israel: ‘How many murdered Jews does it take?’
  • Senate takes first steps to regulate AI in annual defense bill
  • Putin lashes out at West over Ukrainian incursion into Russian territory: report
  • Gallagher accuses Biden admin of being ‘divided’ on whether China or climate change is top threat to US
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

previous post
Israel’s success, Iran’s failure and the chances of igniting the Mideast powder keg
next post
FLASHBACK: Biden made revealing comment about niece’s Obama admin role while praising ‘rising China’

You may also like

Powerless over power: After shifts in GOP landscape, McConnell’s leadership...

March 2, 2024

Solana and Cardano: Cardano drops to new weekly low

October 24, 2024

White House defends Biden visiting Ukraine before Ohio train disaster...

February 24, 2023

Turkish lawmaker suffers heart attack after declaring Israel will ‘not...

December 13, 2023

SafeMoon and Litecoin: Levels and Prices for Tuesday

October 15, 2024

DC councilman calls for ‘increased police presence’ after touting ‘biggest...

February 3, 2023

I’m a pro-life Democrat who presents a big dilemma for...

October 4, 2023

Sen. Cotton wants to crack down on cybersecurity threats to...

January 26, 2024

Massachusetts Gov. Healey appoints new veterans’ secretary

February 18, 2023

Chris Christie fumes over Trump’s ‘absurd’ claims on indictment: ‘Three...

June 26, 2023

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Investment Portfolio Feeling Stagnant? Transform Your Path Today

      May 9, 2025
    • Confused by the Market? Let the Traffic Light Indicator Guide You

      May 9, 2025
    • Which Will Hit First: SPX 6100 or SPX 5100?

      May 9, 2025
    • The V Reversal is Impressive, but is it Enough?

      May 9, 2025
    • Krispy Kreme stock plunges after doughnut chain pauses McDonald’s rollout, pulls outlook

      May 8, 2025

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be...

      June 27, 2024 2,633 views
    • 2

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as...

      August 9, 2024 2,339 views
    • 3

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese...

      June 25, 2024 2,321 views
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful...

      July 10, 2024 2,303 views
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility...

      August 29, 2024 2,186 views

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,066)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,534)

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be revived under new House GOP bill

      June 27, 2024
    • 2

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as Harris camp blasts ‘lying’ critics

      August 9, 2024
    • 3

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese businesses to Delaware: ‘Longtime friends’

      June 25, 2024
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful of Chinese spy threats

      July 10, 2024
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility that collaborated with ‘Chinese military company’

      August 29, 2024

    Latest News

    • Investment Portfolio Feeling Stagnant? Transform Your Path Today

      May 9, 2025
    • Confused by the Market? Let the Traffic Light Indicator Guide...

      May 9, 2025
    • Which Will Hit First: SPX 6100 or SPX 5100?

      May 9, 2025

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,066)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,534)

    Disclaimer: RoundTableThoughts.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 RoundTableThoughts.com. All Rights Reserved.

    Round Table Thoughts
    • Investing
    • Stock
    Round Table Thoughts
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick

    Read alsox

    Russia not ‘bluffing’ with nuclear threats...

    June 1, 2024

    More 2024 headaches for Biden as...

    November 11, 2023

    Experts bash White House claims of...

    January 18, 2024
    Sign In

    Keep me signed in until I sign out

    Forgot your password?

    Password Recovery

    A new password will be emailed to you.

    Have received a new password? Login here