• Investing
  • Stock
Round Table Thoughts
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Home Economy Trump v US: SCOTUS likely to determine presidents get ‘some amount’ of immunity, experts say
Economy

Trump v US: SCOTUS likely to determine presidents get ‘some amount’ of immunity, experts say

by April 25, 2024
by April 25, 2024 0 comment
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

The Supreme Court is set to consider arguably the highest-profile cases of the term Thursday to determine whether former President Trump can claim presidential immunity against criminal charges brought by the Biden Justice Department.

Special Counsel Jack Smith, who brought charges against Trump following his investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot and Trump’s alleged plot to overturn the 2020 election result, argued in briefs submitted to the high court that ‘presidents are not above the law.’

Trump’s legal team conversely argued, ‘A denial of criminal immunity would incapacitate every future President… [t]he threat of future prosecution and imprisonment would become a political cudgel to influence the most sensitive and controversial decisions, taking away the strength, authority, and decisiveness of the Presidency.’ 

Legal experts told Fox News Digital that while all nine justices might be skeptical of Trump’s sweeping immunity claims, they are likely to give guidance on where presidential immunity from criminal prosecution ends for actions taken while in the Oval Office — which could have a profound impact in the criminal cases against the former president.

Jonathan Turley, a practicing criminal defense attorney and professor at George Washington University, told Fox News Digital the case is ‘surrounded by rather steep constitutional cliffs.’

‘This case may be rather maddening for the justices because it is surrounded by rather steep constitutional cliffs. If the court goes one way, a president has little protection in carrying out the duties of his office. If they turned the other way, he has a little accountability for the most serious criminal acts,’ Turley said. 

‘This is a court that tends to be incremental. They tend not to favor sweeping rulings,’ he said.

The Justice Department argued in lower court that a president has virtually no immunity when he leaves office, and the lower court agreed.

Turley says the justices ‘could reject the lower court decision and send it back for a more nuanced approach on constitutional immunity.’

‘The justices may find that presidents do require immunity, even with regard to some criminal acts,’ Turley said, adding that ‘any remand would work significantly in the former president’s favor on a tactical level.’

Turley explained that if the case were to be remanded back down to Judge Tanya Chutkan in the D.C. District Court, that process would make a trial before the November election ‘even less likely.’ 

‘There are both constitutional and tactical aspects to the ruling, but I think these justices are likely to approach this argument with an eye toward balancing these interests, and if that’s the case, they could well come up with a different approach than the lower court or the former president,’ Turley said.

The thrust of Trump’s legal argument is that Supreme Court precedent says absolute immunity from civil liability exists for a former president for his official acts, and that the same immunity should apply to a criminal context. 

‘There’s a real likelihood that the Supreme Court will give some concrete guidance on the exact amount of protection a president is entitled to,’ Jim Trusty, former legal counsel for Trump and a former federal prosecutor, told Fox News Digital.

‘There are still likely to be factual issues that the lower courts will then have to decide as to where President Trump’s actions fit within this continuum of protected or unprotected conduct,’ he explained.

John Shu, a constitutional law expert who served in both the George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush administrations, gave a similar view.

‘The chances of the Supreme Court giving the office of the president some amount of level of immunity are pretty good,’ Shu told Fox News Digital.

But Shu also said ‘there’s also a decent chance that whatever immunity the court carves out, it may not encompass Trump’s alleged acts.’

‘They won’t be making purely legal arguments, but political power arguments as well, and they’ll have to get at least five Supreme Court justices to agree with them,’ Shu said.

Trusty said the questions put to each of the parties in Thursday’s oral arguments ‘could be pretty transparent as to each justice’s view of immunity.’

So far, Shu observed, Trump’s attorneys have argued that the president has absolute immunity, even after he leaves office, for any and all acts.

‘I don’t think the court will go that far,’ Shu said.

Similarly, Trusty said he expects the court to ‘give very little credit to the notion of absolutely unlimited immunity, as President Trump’s lawyers have argued.’

‘But I do think there is a strong possibility that the court confirms the notion that immunity protects the president and that their ruling could set in motion the eventual dismissal of the Jan. 6, Mar-a-Lago and Georgia cases,’ he said.

The Supreme Court will hear the case, Trump v. United States, on Thursday at 10 a.m.

The Justice Department declined to comment.

Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung said in a statement, ‘Without immunity for official acts, there can be no Presidency. No President in American history has faced prosecution for his official acts — until now.’

‘Allowing political opponents to prosecute the President once he leaves office will distort the President’s most important decisions. Even during his Presidency, his enemies will blackmail and extort him with threats of lawless criminal charges and imprisonment once his term ends. The Framers of our Constitution wisely created a system that prevented this endless, destructive cycle of recrimination for 234 years,’ he continued.

‘The Supreme Court should uphold Presidential immunity and put an end to Jack Smith’s deranged, unconstitutional witch hunt against President Trump, once and for all.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
You Might Also Like
  • Hamas claims it will ‘protect’ hostages, release them ‘when circumstances on the ground allow’
  • Chinese official who praised CCP makes another appearance at top Ivy League school: ‘Historic connections’
  • Maine Democrats make push for paid family leave
  • Possible gunfire breaks out at Trump rally in Pennsylvania
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

previous post
Three Sectors are Showing Strength, Three are Not
next post
Chip Roy raises alarms about George Soros’ purchase of radio giant Audacy

You may also like

Hunter Biden’s gallery sold first son’s artwork to major Dem...

July 25, 2023

Alex Soros’ access to Biden’s White House continues as he’s...

July 6, 2023

Trump slams Iowa’s Republican governor for staying neutral in 2024...

July 11, 2023

Palestinian gunmen fire on motorists in West Bank, killing 1,...

February 23, 2024

Barr slams Trump as weak candidate, makes bold prediction for...

April 10, 2023

Conservatives lash out at Trump after he attacks Chip Roy,...

December 20, 2023

Flashback: Oprah Winfrey once called Trump a ‘folk hero,’ a...

August 22, 2024

Inflation In France Takes a Sudden Plunge in September

September 27, 2024

Antisemitic incidents across Europe, Canada hit record levels 5 months...

March 10, 2024

Johnson warned against making ‘side deals’ with GOP rebels: Don’t...

May 8, 2024

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Amazon taps Xbox co-founder to lead new team developing ‘breakthrough’ consumer products

      May 30, 2025
    • Nvidia results spark global chip rally

      May 30, 2025
    • Boeing to resume airplane deliveries to China next month, ramp up Max production, CEO says

      May 29, 2025
    • Nuclear Power Trio: OKLO, SMR, and CCJ in Focus

      May 29, 2025
    • Analyzing SIL, USO, and NVDA: Could These Bullish Patterns Trigger?

      May 29, 2025

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be...

      June 27, 2024 2,764 views
    • 2

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as...

      August 9, 2024 2,470 views
    • 3

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese...

      June 25, 2024 2,450 views
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful...

      July 10, 2024 2,430 views
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility...

      August 29, 2024 2,307 views

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,105)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,578)

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be revived under new House GOP bill

      June 27, 2024
    • 2

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as Harris camp blasts ‘lying’ critics

      August 9, 2024
    • 3

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese businesses to Delaware: ‘Longtime friends’

      June 25, 2024
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful of Chinese spy threats

      July 10, 2024
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility that collaborated with ‘Chinese military company’

      August 29, 2024

    Latest News

    • Amazon taps Xbox co-founder to lead new team developing ‘breakthrough’...

      May 30, 2025
    • Nvidia results spark global chip rally

      May 30, 2025
    • Boeing to resume airplane deliveries to China next month, ramp...

      May 29, 2025

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,105)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,578)

    Disclaimer: RoundTableThoughts.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 RoundTableThoughts.com. All Rights Reserved.

    Round Table Thoughts
    • Investing
    • Stock
    Round Table Thoughts
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick

    Read alsox

    $15 minimum wage narrowly passes Pennsylvania...

    June 22, 2023

    SAP SE: $277B Giant’s Growth Trajectory...

    October 4, 2024

    UN newsletter exposed for sharing ways...

    April 22, 2024
    Sign In

    Keep me signed in until I sign out

    Forgot your password?

    Password Recovery

    A new password will be emailed to you.

    Have received a new password? Login here