• Investing
  • Stock
Round Table Thoughts
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Home Economy Dems say Katie Britt’s new bill would create ‘database of pregnant women’
Economy

Dems say Katie Britt’s new bill would create ‘database of pregnant women’

by May 15, 2024
by May 15, 2024 0 comment
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

Shortly after it was introduced, Democrats quickly condemned a new Republican bill that aims to compile resources on a government website for expecting mothers, postpartum women and young mothers. They alleged that it was a covert attempt to establish a ‘database of pregnant women,’ potentially enabling the government to block access to abortions.

The More Opportunities for Moms to Succeed Act, which was shortened to the MOMS Act, was introduced by Sen. Katie Britt, the Alabama Republican who made headlines for her response to the State of the Union speech this year. The MOMS Act would establish a government-run website, pregnancy.gov, intended to be a go-to resource for mothers and pregnant women as they seek support through the various stages of both pregnancy and early motherhood.

There is currently a government website for abortion resources, ReproductiveRights.gov. The site routes women to AbortionFinder.org, telling visitors that it can assist with obtaining ‘abortion funds.’ The site provides information on rights to abortions, where to find legal help, and points them toward the Justice Department’s Reproductive Rights Task Force.

Pregnancy.gov would be ‘a clearinghouse of relevant resources available for pregnant and postpartum women, and women parenting young children,’ per the bill. The site would ask for a woman’s zip code in order to find local resources and populate them for her. It would additionally include ‘a mechanism for users to take an assessment through the website and provide consent to use the user’s contact information, which the [Department of Health and Human Services secretary] may use to conduct outreach via phone or email to follow up with users on additional resources that would be helpful for the users to review.’

Democratic National Committee Chair Jaime Harrison slammed the proposal, writing on X, formerly Twitter, ‘So she creates a database of pregnant women, so Trump then knows who to prosecute if any of those women get an abortion.’

‘Yet another example of why this election is fundamental to protecting your liberty & freedoms!’ he added. 

Democrat lawmakers echoed the claim made by the DNC chair. Senate President Pro Tempore Patty Murray, D-Wash., wrote on X that the measure is ‘a dystopian proposal to track, intimidate, & coerce pregnant women into carrying their pregnancies to term, no matter their circumstances.’

‘It is a dangerous road map for how the GOP would weaponize the government to control women’s bodies,’ she wrote.

Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., attacked the bill as ‘horrific’ and that ‘Rs are already escalating their authoritarian repression of reproductive freedom – calling for a pregnancy database and funding for anti-abortion centers,’ referencing the crisis pregnancy centers that could be eligible for grants under the measure.

Crisis pregnancy centers are organizations that usually provide emotional and financial support to women, among other things. The centers are known for encouraging women to seek out non-abortion alternatives and often providing support for women to do so.

Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, lobbed the same criticism, calling the bill ‘hypocritical’ because many Republicans oppose ‘a national firearm registry.’

Britt hit back at the critics, telling Fox News Digital in a statement, ‘The desperate Democrat smear campaign against the MOMS Act is shameful but not surprising.’

‘Instead of being a part of a commonsense solution that would help vulnerable women, children, and families, some on the left would apparently rather fearmonger and spread intentionally false disinformation in a blindly partisan attempt to demonize their political opponents,’ she said.

The proposed legislation is co-led by Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., and Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., and co-sponsored by Sens. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., Steve Daines, R-Mont., Cindy Hyde-Smith, R-Miss., Jerry Moran, R-Kan., Thom Tillis, R-N.C., Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, Mike Rounds, R-S.D., Roger Wicker, R-Miss., and James Lankford, R-Okla.

A review by Fox News Digital found that nowhere in the bill text is any language authorizing the construction of a so-called ‘database’ of pregnant women. And it is not explicitly written that any woman must indicate whether she is pregnant or not, as the site purports it will provide resources for postpartum women and mothers with young children.

According to language in the legislation, there is no compulsory element mandating women to visit the site or provide their zip code, email or phone number, as the idea of a pregnancy database might imply.

If Britt’s measure were to become law, it would not be the first government website to prompt visitors for location or contact information. Healthcare.gov, for example, asks visitors for their home state, email and data policy consent before taking any other action on the site.

Furthermore, when the secretary is tasked under the proposal with preparing a report on the website’s usefulness to Congress, they would be specifically prohibited from including ‘any personal identifying information regarding individuals who have used the website.’

‘These claims are intentionally false and dangerous,’ top Pro-Life organization Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America told Fox News Digital in a statement. 

‘We encourage everyone to read the bill, which provides a database of help for women, not a database of women. Women’s privacy is expressly protected,’ the statement continued. 

‘Any claims to the contrary are nothing but a cynical attempt to distract from the Democrats’ obsession with abortion and their relentless attacks on charities that help women,’ per the SBA Pro-Life America statement. 

Advancing American Freedom, an organization started by former Vice President Mike Pence, also weighed in on the false claims spread regarding the legislation. AAF Policy Director John Shelton told Fox News Digital, ‘The abortion industry tipped its hand when it made baseless smears against Senator Britt’s MOMS Act.’

‘Planned Parenthood would rather force hopeful mothers into abortions than ensure they have access to pregnancy resource centers and child support as they seek to raise their kids,’ he continued, noting the measure’s provision for child support to be accessible during pregnancy.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
You Might Also Like
  • Maria Bartiromo discusses Biden’s foreign policy agenda with Reps. Tenney, Arrington, Gooden, and more
  • Trump classified documents judge rules on motion to dismiss case
  • Indiana mail-in voting crackdown headed to governor’s desk
  • New Jersey Gov. Murphy appoints 2 Democrats, 2 Republicans to election watchdog posts
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

previous post
China Tariffs Drive Upside for Rare Earth Minerals
next post
Key moderate Republican Don Bacon fends off state GOP-backed populist primary challenger

You may also like

Vivek Ramaswamy reveals his ‘ideal’ VP pick: ‘That’s the mold...

December 30, 2023

Schumer says ‘good night for American people’ after Senate passes...

November 16, 2023

Nvidia Stock Soars 16% as AI Spending Takes Center Stage

October 21, 2024

ACLU challenges Texas drag ban, set to go into effect...

August 4, 2023

Biden addresses nation after Congress passes bipartisan debt ceiling bill,...

June 3, 2023

Pence says he supports an impeachment inquiry by House Republicans

September 8, 2023

Kamala Harris matches record for most tie-breaking votes cast as...

July 14, 2023

WATCH: Top Republicans showered with boos from Trump victory crowd,...

February 25, 2024

South Dakota Gov. Noem breaks longstanding tradition, foregoes press conferences

January 28, 2023

Israel ambassador blasts UN ‘silence’ over Hamas atrocities; to wear...

October 31, 2023

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Krispy Kreme stock plunges after doughnut chain pauses McDonald’s rollout, pulls outlook

      May 8, 2025
    • Don’t Buy Robinhood Stock… Until You See This Chart Setup

      May 8, 2025
    • UnitedHealthcare sued by shareholders over reaction to CEO’s killing

      May 8, 2025
    • The Unpredictable Stock Market: How to Make Sense of It

      May 8, 2025
    • AMD CEO calls China a ‘large opportunity’ and warns against strict U.S. chip controls

      May 7, 2025

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be...

      June 27, 2024 2,632 views
    • 2

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as...

      August 9, 2024 2,339 views
    • 3

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese...

      June 25, 2024 2,320 views
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful...

      July 10, 2024 2,303 views
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility...

      August 29, 2024 2,186 views

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,066)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,530)

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be revived under new House GOP bill

      June 27, 2024
    • 2

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as Harris camp blasts ‘lying’ critics

      August 9, 2024
    • 3

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese businesses to Delaware: ‘Longtime friends’

      June 25, 2024
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful of Chinese spy threats

      July 10, 2024
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility that collaborated with ‘Chinese military company’

      August 29, 2024

    Latest News

    • Krispy Kreme stock plunges after doughnut chain pauses McDonald’s rollout,...

      May 8, 2025
    • Don’t Buy Robinhood Stock… Until You See This Chart Setup

      May 8, 2025
    • UnitedHealthcare sued by shareholders over reaction to CEO’s killing

      May 8, 2025

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,066)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,530)

    Disclaimer: RoundTableThoughts.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 RoundTableThoughts.com. All Rights Reserved.

    Round Table Thoughts
    • Investing
    • Stock
    Round Table Thoughts
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick

    Read alsox

    House to vote on CR funding...

    September 30, 2023

    UK prime minister ‘unequivocal’ in solidarity...

    October 11, 2023

    Trudeau expands probe into claims Canadian...

    June 11, 2024
    Sign In

    Keep me signed in until I sign out

    Forgot your password?

    Password Recovery

    A new password will be emailed to you.

    Have received a new password? Login here