• Investing
  • Stock
Round Table Thoughts
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Home Economy 5 key lines from Supreme Court Trump immunity decision
Economy

5 key lines from Supreme Court Trump immunity decision

by July 2, 2024
by July 2, 2024 0 comment
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

The Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling Monday in Trump v. United States, concluding that a president has substantial immunity from prosecution for official acts committed while in office, but not for unofficial acts.  

The decision clarifies whether a former president can be criminally charged by prosecutors for acts committed while in office. Former President Trump brought the question before the court after Special Counsel Jack Smith accused him of various crimes related to Trump’s attempt to challenge the results of the 2020 presidential election.  

Smith has charged Trump following a months-long investigation into whether the former president was involved in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot and interfered in the 2020 election result. Trump has pleaded not guilty to all charges and argued he should be immune from prosecution from official acts done as president of the U.S.  

Here are 5 key lines from the ruling:  

Chief Justice John Roberts says ‘The president enjoys no immunity for his unofficial acts’  

In a 6-3 decision in the case, the high court sent the matter back down to a lower court, as the justices did not apply the ruling to whether or not former President Trump is immune from prosecution regarding actions related to efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election.  

Roberts, writing for the majority, said ‘The President enjoys no immunity for his unofficial acts, and not everything the President does is official.   

‘The President is not above the law,’ Roberts continued. ‘But Congress may not criminalize the President’s conduct in carrying out the responsibilities of the Executive Branch under the Constitution. And the system of separated powers designed by the Framers has always demanded an energetic, independent Executive.  

‘The President therefore may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is entitled, at a minimum, to a presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts,’ he added. ‘That immunity applies equally to all occupants of the Oval Office, regardless of politics, policy, or party.’  

Justice Sonia Sotomayor argues the ‘president is now a king above the law’  

Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote in a dissenting opinion that ‘in every use of official power, the President is now a king above the law.’ 

‘Let the President violate the law, let him exploit the trappings of his office for personal gain, let him use his official power for evil ends. Because if he knew that he may one day face liability for breaking the law, he might not be as bold and fearless as we would like him to be,’ she wrote. ‘That is the majority’s message today.   

‘Even if these nightmare scenarios never play out, and I pray they never do, the damage has been done,’ Sotomayor added. ‘The relationship between the President and the people he serves has shifted irrevocably.’ 

Roberts responds to dissenting opinions, says president is ‘unlike anyone else’ 

Roberts responded to the liberal justices: ‘Coming up short on reasoning, the dissents repeatedly level variations of the accusation that the Court has rendered the President ‘above the law.’’ 

‘Like everyone else, the President is subject to prosecution in his unofficial capacity. But unlike anyone else, the President is a branch of government, and the Constitution vests in him sweeping powers and duties. Accounting for that reality — and ensuring that the President may exercise those powers forcefully, as the Framers anticipated he would — does not place him above the law; it preserves the basic structure of the Constitution from which that law derives.’ 

‘The dissents’ positions in the end boil down to ignoring the Constitution’s separation of powers and the Court’s precedent and instead fear mongering on the basis of extreme hypotheticals about a future where the President ‘feels empowered to violate federal criminal law,’ he wrote. 

Justice Clarence Thomas says ‘president’s immunity from prosecution for his official acts is the law’  

Thomas, who was among the majority, wrote in the decision that ‘in this case, there has been much discussion about ensuring that a President ‘is not above the law.’  

‘But, as the Court explains, the President’s immunity from prosecution for his official acts is the law,’ he continued. ‘The Constitution provides for ‘an energetic executive,’ because such an Executive is ‘essential to… the security of liberty.’’  

‘Respecting the protections that the Constitution provides for the Office of the Presidency secures liberty. In that same vein, the Constitution also secures liberty by separating the powers to create and fill offices,’ Thomas also said. ‘And, there are serious questions whether the Attorney General has violated that structure by creating an office of the Special Counsel that has not been established by law.’  

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson says majority is ‘discarding of a model of accountability for criminal acts’ 

In her dissenting opinion, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote that she ‘simply cannot abide the majority’s senseless discarding of a model of accountability for criminal acts that treats every citizen of this country as being equally subject to the law — as the Rule of Law requires.   

‘That core principle has long prevented our Nation from devolving into despotism. Yet the Court now opts to let down the guardrails of the law for one extremely powerful category of citizen: any future President who has the will to flout Congress’s established boundaries,’ she added.  

Fox News’ Brooke Singman contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
You Might Also Like
  • America’s Allies Should Fear Abandonment
  • Red state AGs move to block abortion ballot language pro-life group says is ‘deceptive,’ goes farther than Roe
  • WH quietly corrects Jean-Pierre’s claim Biden has taken more press questions than Trump, Obama, Bush combined
  • Andy Biggs calls for contempt charges against Eric Swalwell for aiding Hunter Biden
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

previous post
Biden’s ex-press secretary Jen Psaki to sit down with House GOP panel probing chaotic Afghanistan withdrawal
next post
Biden not in contact with Dem leaders on the Hill, reports say

You may also like

Iran Attacks Israel: Oil Surges, Markets React, US Supports

October 3, 2024

Blinken pressured to freeze Afghanistan aid after revelation nearly $300M...

August 7, 2024

Biden lets American military info slip during live interview, sparking...

July 10, 2023

GOP lawmaker wants to crack down on climate change activists...

December 14, 2023

Trump, GOP take aim at Kamala Harris as her popularity...

July 12, 2024

FBI improperly used warrantless search powers more than 278,000 times...

May 20, 2023

Israel Security Agency creates new unit to hunt, kill every...

October 23, 2023

Vivek Ramaswamy on 9/11: ‘I don’t believe the government has...

August 3, 2023

Vance’s ‘America First’ foreign policy in spotlight ahead of highly...

July 18, 2024

Israel eliminates Hezbollah senior commander as terror group warns it...

February 16, 2024

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Krispy Kreme stock plunges after doughnut chain pauses McDonald’s rollout, pulls outlook

      May 8, 2025
    • Don’t Buy Robinhood Stock… Until You See This Chart Setup

      May 8, 2025
    • UnitedHealthcare sued by shareholders over reaction to CEO’s killing

      May 8, 2025
    • The Unpredictable Stock Market: How to Make Sense of It

      May 8, 2025
    • AMD CEO calls China a ‘large opportunity’ and warns against strict U.S. chip controls

      May 7, 2025

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be...

      June 27, 2024 2,633 views
    • 2

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as...

      August 9, 2024 2,339 views
    • 3

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese...

      June 25, 2024 2,320 views
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful...

      July 10, 2024 2,303 views
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility...

      August 29, 2024 2,186 views

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,066)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,530)

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be revived under new House GOP bill

      June 27, 2024
    • 2

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as Harris camp blasts ‘lying’ critics

      August 9, 2024
    • 3

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese businesses to Delaware: ‘Longtime friends’

      June 25, 2024
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful of Chinese spy threats

      July 10, 2024
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility that collaborated with ‘Chinese military company’

      August 29, 2024

    Latest News

    • Krispy Kreme stock plunges after doughnut chain pauses McDonald’s rollout,...

      May 8, 2025
    • Don’t Buy Robinhood Stock… Until You See This Chart Setup

      May 8, 2025
    • UnitedHealthcare sued by shareholders over reaction to CEO’s killing

      May 8, 2025

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,066)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,530)

    Disclaimer: RoundTableThoughts.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 RoundTableThoughts.com. All Rights Reserved.

    Round Table Thoughts
    • Investing
    • Stock
    Round Table Thoughts
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick

    Read alsox

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says he...

    August 14, 2023

    Supreme Court: Trump must respond to...

    December 12, 2023

    IDF strikes Hezbollah terror targets in...

    August 25, 2024
    Sign In

    Keep me signed in until I sign out

    Forgot your password?

    Password Recovery

    A new password will be emailed to you.

    Have received a new password? Login here