• Investing
  • Stock
Round Table Thoughts
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Home Economy Supreme Court appears wary of massive tax code overhaul
Economy

Supreme Court appears wary of massive tax code overhaul

by December 6, 2023
by December 6, 2023 0 comment
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

A Washington state couple’s nearly $15,000 tax bill was debated by the Supreme Court on Tuesday, in a case the Biden administration says could have ‘far-reaching consequences,’ potentially costing the government more than $5 trillion.

At issue is whether Congress has authority to tax people and companies for sums that have not yet been received, or ‘realized,’ as income.

The current case may be relatively small in scope, but the high court was told its eventual ruling could have an enormous impact on taxing the wealthiest Americans who shield their earnings through a variety of investment loopholes.

SUPREME COURT DISMISSES CASE IMPACTING ACCESSIBILITY INFORMATION ON HOTEL WEBSITES

In a lively two hours of oral arguments, the high court heard claims that its decision would cause financial chaos, upend much of the federal tax code, and derail a so-called ‘wealth tax’ that has been promoted by some Democrats, but has not yet been enacted.

The justices appeared cautious about issuing a sweeping ruling, and instead seemed ready to uphold the current tax on unrealized foreign income.

‘We don’t have to agree with you on that for you to prevail,’ said Justice Brett Kavanaugh on the implications of a sweeping decision, telling Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar that the government could win on narrow grounds.

‘Why is it that you think we can decide for you without putting any of those kinds of very established taxation schemes at risk?’ Justice Elena Kagan asked the lawyer for the investors.

Charles and Kathleen Moore, a retired couple from Redmond, Washington, are challenging taxes on their 13% minority shareholder stake in KisanKraft, an Indian corporation that supplies power tools to small farms in that Asian country.

The married couple says the company reinvested its earnings to expand the business rather than distribute dividends or payments to its stakeholders, and therefore should not be considered taxable income.

‘If you haven’t received any income, how can you be required to pay income taxes?’ Charles Moore says in a video from the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a libertarian group representing the couple in court. ‘It seemed, to both of us, unconstitutional.’

The specific provision in question was part of a massive 2017 corporate tax overhaul passed by Congress and signed into law by then-President Trump.

A one-time levy – known as the ‘mandatory repatriation tax’ – is imposed on deferred earnings of American shareholders in foreign corporations, even any gains that have not been ‘realized’ or passed on to them. It was imposed as an offset to other tax benefits.

SUPREME COURT HEARS ARGUMENTS IN $6 BILLION PURDUE PHARMA SETTLEMENT THAT WOULD GRANT IMMUNITY TO SACKLERS

The IRS says that provision could reap the government $340 billion over ten years.

The provision was designed to address one of several workarounds investors have relied on for years to access unrealized investment property, before receiving it and paying taxes on it.

Groups supporting the government say while the Moores may not have received any actual money, their initial $40,000 foreign investment has increased over the years to more than a half-million dollars.

More broadly, groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce supporting the Moores’ situation say this case could be applied as a preemptive strike against any wealth tax on the assets of the richest Americans, including stocks that are only taxed when they are sold.

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has championed such a tax for years. Just last week, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-OR) led a group of 15 fellow Democrats to introduce the Billionaires Income Tax.

And President Biden has suggested a version of a ‘billionaire’s tax’ on U.S. households worth more than $100 million to pay a minimum of 25% on capital gains each year, whether those assets were sold for a profit or still held by them.

But none of the justices publicly expressed enthusiasm about venturing down that path, suggesting any consideration of a wealth tax or other IRS provisions is off the table.

The arguments focused instead on how a narrow ruling could be crafted, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor saying, ‘I don’t fault the parties for shooting for the stars but I guess the tenor of the questions is that nobody’s happy with anybody’s definition of anything, okay?’

The Moores’ appeal prompted one of the largest series of amicus briefs filed with the high court from a variety of interest groups and lawmakers.

Concerns were expressed over how a ruling would affect other longstanding tax provisions – including business partnerships, real estate investments, and charitable and philanthropic donations.

An underlying ethics question has dogged the Supreme Court’s consideration of the tax case.

Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats urged Justice Samuel Alito to recuse, because lawyer David Rivkin representing the Moores also co-conducted four hours of Wall Street Journal opinion page interviews with the justice.

Alito in a four-page statement in September refused to step aside.

‘There is no valid reason for my recusal in this case,’ he wrote. ‘We are required to put favorable or unfavorable comments and any personal connections with an attorney out of our minds and judge the cases based solely on the law and the facts. And that is what we do.’

Alito was an active questioner in the Moore case.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
You Might Also Like
  • Speaker Johnson draws battle lines ahead of government spending showdown
  • Arkansas Gov. Sanders names new director of Parks Department’s Heritage Division
  • New poll reveals Dems are losing significant support from these 2 key demographics: ‘Especially concerning’
  • Trump to participate in virtual pre-sentencing interview with probation officers
Share
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsapp

previous post
Speaker Johnson hits back at House GOP critics in closed-door meeting
next post
How and where to watch Donald Trump’s town hall with Fox News’ Sean Hannity

You may also like

Third-party group No Labels inches closer to launching 2024 ‘unity’...

March 14, 2024

GOP presidential candidate Nikki Haley pledges to cut billions in...

February 26, 2023

Hezbollah poses ‘real risk of escalation’ at Israel northern border,...

October 16, 2023

Wisconsin DNR releases 3.5K public comments on wolf management plan

April 8, 2023

State of the Union: Biden to reflect on COVID, Jan....

February 8, 2023

Mike Pence slams Trump and his GOP ‘imitators’ for lurching...

September 6, 2023

Protectionism in Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act Harms Consumers and Domestic...

December 11, 2022

Putin thanks Kim Jong Un for supporting Russian invasion of...

June 19, 2024

Biden admin quietly delays major oil, gas leasing decision

March 9, 2023

FBI investigating Iran’s hack of Trump campaign documents

August 13, 2024

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • How to Find Compelling Charts in Every Sector

      July 10, 2025
    • White House accuses Powell of mismanaging Federal Reserve, citing headquarters renovation

      July 10, 2025
    • Italian chocolate giant Ferrero to buy Kellogg’s Froot Loops maker

      July 10, 2025
    • OpenAI to release web browser in challenge to Google Chrome

      July 10, 2025
    • Sports executive charged with bid-rigging in Texas arena project

      July 10, 2025

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese...

      June 25, 2024 3,631 views
    • 2

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be...

      June 27, 2024 2,919 views
    • 3

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as...

      August 9, 2024 2,607 views
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful...

      July 10, 2024 2,577 views
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility...

      August 29, 2024 2,451 views

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,171)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,662)

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Biden appointee played key role in recruiting Chinese businesses to Delaware: ‘Longtime friends’

      June 25, 2024
    • 2

      Trump-era China sanctions ended by Biden may be revived under new House GOP bill

      June 27, 2024
    • 3

      Walz’s honeymoon with China gets fresh scrutiny as Harris camp blasts ‘lying’ critics

      August 9, 2024
    • 4

      Shein’s global ambitions leaves some cybersecurity experts fearful of Chinese spy threats

      July 10, 2024
    • 5

      Harris VP pick spent years promoting research facility that collaborated with ‘Chinese military company’

      August 29, 2024

    Latest News

    • How to Find Compelling Charts in Every Sector

      July 10, 2025
    • White House accuses Powell of mismanaging Federal Reserve, citing headquarters...

      July 10, 2025
    • Italian chocolate giant Ferrero to buy Kellogg’s Froot Loops maker

      July 10, 2025

    Categories

    • Economy (7,009)
    • Editor's Pick (2,171)
    • Investing (538)
    • Stock (2,662)

    Disclaimer: RoundTableThoughts.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 RoundTableThoughts.com. All Rights Reserved.

    Round Table Thoughts
    • Investing
    • Stock
    Round Table Thoughts
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick

    Read alsox

    Biden lets American military info slip...

    July 10, 2023

    Democrat in VA race says ‘unqualified’...

    September 10, 2023

    China says NATO poses ‘enormous danger’...

    July 11, 2024
    Sign In

    Keep me signed in until I sign out

    Forgot your password?

    Password Recovery

    A new password will be emailed to you.

    Have received a new password? Login here